the thing was, i think a lot of happened now. i think it's, it's, i think we've just started it. and um, i'm sure it is good to go along with. i just want to give you a sneak peak of selling now behind the scenes that shouldn't be taking place here in moscow. this is going to be one of the main parts of the movie filming is due to wrap up shortly. and the film is going to be out in september. it's going to be translated into several languages, including english. and i don't know about you, but i am ready to book my tickets right now. so let's even see before things are on c, inlaw skids of little of today's stories. don't forget, you can check our website r t dot com. i'll be back in 30 minutes with plenty. we'll see you then as the, the winds largest democracy votes the rest of the planet watches in an emerging multi polar world. india's voice matters. but who will be the power behind watches,

almost 1000000000 people decide and billions more, react the dns of the new jews. because as then choose for many, essentially it's a way that they may best acute to the ones bullshit games oppressed and nobody can know it seems that the bodies spoken by the same with the the they are probably her my little story because the model girl that i got you, no problem seeing it all out of the know nothing 30 minutes us out in the drive i showed my brother through he was sudden too big of for a lo so now i never look at searches as being the same. well,

i guess i lost my list. that's the outcome of the chicago police. it'd be gang chicago is like, you get photos. i have the lease, you lose the there's another crap thing. another i could have been a doctor or nurse could have been the next president, which i keep losing people out here. the see what, what is your assessment of the following? an official statement by the federal department of foreign affairs of switzerland, russian foreign minister, sergey love. ralph was the 1st person with whom swift minister cassius discussed the practical details of a planned peace conference on ukraine. the genuine peace process can only take place with the participation of both. what are the conditions for such talks to

take place? there's just one word of truth in this that we had a meeting in finance. i see we took part in the new york meeting of the un security council on palestine. i have known him for a long time. he has been rotating in the group of 7 for quite a while and served as the chair actually the elect, a new chair from the members every year. so ignacio castle was at that meeting to and asked for a one on one meeting with me. so we never concealed of the fact that we were having a meeting pictures of the 2 of us were taken when the delegation is left. and this happens right after the demos world economic forum, where the copenhagen format was held by switzerland on its sidelines as requested by the ukrainians. so he asked me if i saw his media stake out after the meeting. i said i didn't, and he told me and then he stated to the media that after another ukrainian piece,

formerly meeting, they came to the conclusion that there was no points in kind of eating without russia. and i said they didn't really need to meet up again to realize that given their experience. and if they didn't realize this, then why do they hold that meeting in dallas? i'm not betraying any secrets here really. and by revealing this information, i've told this to my colleagues on many occasions, even if you do reveal us and chris, we won't be upset to school. so he said to me that he just wanted to make a smooth entry into the process in order to be able to adjusted from within. the wanted to prepare a 2 part conference, which is any set. it might not be possible to invite rush on to the 1st part of it, so only to the 2nd part. so i asked him what they were going to do at the 1st part of the conference, which she told me, they were going to finalize this a lensky formula. as it had many things in the developing countries were interested in. and i told him quite frankly, there were 3 things in it that zaleski and the west to we're after and rushes capitulation and withdrawal to its 1991, the borders,

the russian leadership and brought to justice, will support marshal and reparations. and in between the lines, there was an obligation to be imposed on russians regarding troops that could be deployed within the 200 kilometers border zone. as for energy before the security for nuclear security and cultural cooperation with exchange of po w's search for missing persons, those are just peripheral items put in place around this ultimatum of to win the hearts of the global majority with these countries are being enticed in the following manner, all right, so you don't want to be enemies with russia. you don't want to rush into pay reparations. you don't want to bring it to court. we understand how about you just take the food security issue that just supervisor what security or energy security of these people are all just high class fraudsters. i mean high class in their own areas of responsibility areas they supervise and their relevant governments,

but they are frauds at the core, the schemes they offer, our fraud schemes they're doing so deliberately. it is impossible not to see this and some of our partners, including several bricks countries that attended previous meetings. we know for sure that at every meeting, they emphasize the need for having a conversation with russia. we appreciate the signals sense from their side. but if, as the west ones, the zalesky formula is adjusted and fine tuned, and the west knows how to do that. for instance, by introducing meaningless language provisions about a quality security interests. well, keeping the sense on changed. that is not the path that we should follow really to take the chinese positions. one that we respect some of the, the formulated, their own 12 items, the last february. and recently german chancellor, all our shoals paid a visit to chinese present intrusion. paying right after that schultz announced quite dis, honestly,

misusing things supports the peace conference in switzerland. we've got a question prepared on that subject. mr. law for office, so don't support it for us yet. well, the point i wanted to get across is that according to china, the thing we need to do 1st is to get an insight into the root causes of the crisis . i mean, the cold war mentality must be dropped one where the party see each other as adversaries were enemies. we need to have a clear cut obligation to look for solutions that would take into account security aspects and ensure that security is indivisible. this is a very different approach. now the china with going back to the recent statement is by 4 administered, one e and other chinese officials, china called for a conference that would be acceptable both to russia and ukraine. this effectively means it isn't the zaleski formula which should be starting with. in fact, his plan should be put aside if like our president said, they are willing to do that. then we can start discussing the basic foundations for

talks upon which everything else will be built. asked for switzerland's initiatives, the swiss are not covering our meetings with them properly. in fact, there were just one meetings at the end of january or an early february. we don't remember what exactly, and even if we forget about the ukraine aspect, switzerland is not a good platform for us. it is because they are no longer a neutral party. i'm sure. instead of being a neutral country for the holding outright adversarial stance as they signed and joined in on every sanction against russia. without exception, some countries, those that are not part of the european union, wanted to add new ons to their activities on that front too. however, switzerland eagerly joined in on every section imposed on russian. moreover, several months ago, they have adopted a doctrine where a strategy of national security, which says they should pursue security partnerships, not with russia, but against russia. so it's rather odd to see them presenting themselves as so

hospitable, when all they hope to do is retain their relevance as mediators. because until recently, everyone was fine with meeting in geneva or in vienna. so that's that some, you know, some of the 10 for mr. lab rob, we've covered the zalinski plan and we're all pretty clear about that. no discussions here. as for the stumble agreement, it doesn't work as well because we have been double cross there as well. are there any other options? are there any alternatives? any 3rd option? if we look at the situation on the ground, we can see that russia control some parts of the heart of region, but god only knows what will happen tomorrow. the situation is evolving as we speak . are we fighting until the end, or is there something else we could formulate an agreement of sorts and present that to the world. but it's just for the little plus, the president putin has already put forward his formula after the assembled process was over and after the west winds beyond supplying long range munitions and arms to crime and also started to help them. retrofits and their equipments. yes,

there are western specialists retrofitting many different types of missiles and ukraine to extend their range. and after these missiles started being used to attack civilian targets. in fact, there was an episode when they used drones past with a lot of explosives and sent them to one of our strategic airfields. when we analyzed the equipment used, we saw that the drone itself was upgraded to extend its range significantly after that came the crime in bridge attack. then they kept attacking service, double hindering navigation in the black sea. attacking both worships and commercial vessels. and i'm not even talking about bold garage occurs and all the other of terrorist attacks on russian cities. but at some point, and president putin spoke about this one, answering the question as to how we can make our own land safe. he said, we need to move the line from which they can attack us. i believe that harcourt plays an important role here. and what next? where do we move the line next?

it's wells. i mean, if we move it to hard codes, the previous border will be safe, but then other territories will be under attack. so we still have to move forward. our position is that the special military operation must continue, but we signal clearly that we are ready to negotiate and these are not empty words . however, speaking to the landscape is useless. for many reasons, his master is upset and we quoted one of them earlier. all those words about losing our head gemini, about the geo political failure of the west. in fact it was you'll said barrell, who stated it would be very difficult for the west to accept such a defeat because their reputation is on the line. i personally don't think it would cost them much in that respect. after the us fled from vietnam after they fled from us again to stand or looking at how they are being driven from a rock or take syria where they're being pressured from different groups. is there

a single case where the us remains involved? unless, of course, the goal has been to sell chaos from the very start. but if their real objective was the same as stated one, then it means they failed. they failed across the board. take haiti, for example, a tiny nation with the americans have been in charge of it for more than 100 years since 1918. now there was rapids crime gangs running the place and some criminals came to power. the u. s. has been trying to deal with that, establish some agreements now there was ramp and crime gangs running the place and some criminal came to power. the u. s. has been trying to deal with him and establish some agreements of triple a country right in the us back yard. they've been focusing a lot on heating, including at the human security council, but with no success so far it looks. how about they just deal with that 1st rush

that has to deal with ukraine because there is a threat opposed to us for the man riggins, this thread coming from she is at the very least drug trafficking. all these drugs are go into the us. now i wanted to you to tell us about shooting things initiative, but you've already covered that. so i'm going to ask a bro, the question, something that many people would also like to know, and we all agreed that it would be all, some a fresher remains in the course of independence from the west. i personally think that we should move towards not being dependent on anyone, but in the context of our relations with china. what do you see there is a risk now that we've moved away from the west of us to be coming to a reliance on china. maybe we won't, but if we do, would that be a problem or not? after all? well now, best pals was trying to make it the, the china is a different civilization entirely and it has different principles at its core. now

that doesn't mean they don't want to benefit from their relations with us. they want to develop their economy, their social sphere, their security, just like everyone else in that aspect of china is still a rather young country. yes, it's civilization is thousands of years old, but there came a point in his history when it suffered greatly under colonialism. colonizers came from all over from european countries from japan. and the chinese remember that very well. it is in their nature to buy their time. never to rush to quote things yelping. the journey of a 1000 miles starts with a single step before speaking about china's dominant position in the modern global economy. they've arrived at it in a very discreet way, without people noticing those 20 years ago. the global chinese factory was making products for the west quotes to toys, and then step by step over time they came to their present position. so patients is one of the remarkable qualities of the chinese people that china now has emissions

that spanned the entire planet. that is certainly true decision paying has presented several initiatives, like the community of common destiny, which says that we all need to work out some common principles. the belt and road initiative and economic project with the goal of chinese expansion. in a positive sense. the expansion of china is capital and industry there, logistics chains. really, there's a global security initiative to which has in many ways aligned with our own principals. i've visited badging recently and i spoke to the chinese leadership. we discussed the implementation of all these initiatives. you were clearly if we look at the global context and global security, our primary goal is to ensure security in your ration because the, your atlantic model on which security had been based since the creation of the o. s. c, which was during soviet times the same model that we relied on after the disintegration of the soviet union. i'm not going to name all the documents that we signed together to ensure our security. the west didn't want to honor these documents,

so that you were atlantic security model, was embodied in nato, and the us, the games, and with nato. we even had the nato russia council with the model and it's present iterations has become obsolete, which is why now we want to talk about your age and security, and it is more reasonable because this is all one continents. there are no outside is from across the ocean participating unit. the new model will be based on uniting all the existing projects, like the e, u. c s t o c i s, and the s c o. china is built in road and it should have creates an economic foundation for future deals in terms of security. and we intend to keep the door open to the western parts of the continental to everyone. but eurasia is our common home to our common temple. so everyone needs to act accordingly, instead of bringing the wants and desires of the americans into the new model, because they will absolutely try to interfere with them,

like they always do. like they're now middling in the asia pacific region and indian ocean and other regions to go. but china is already a very powerful country machine. however, when china proposes its projects, it does not give out orders, it just says ok, this is what we can propose. an economic project to build a new railway in central asia or an africa or elsewhere. and the agreement is reached based on the balance of interest. the same is true for our relations with russia. last year we saw a record growth of trading over $240000000000.00, and it is going to get even bigger and major part of our investment cooperation is high tech, nuclear energy building, modern aircraft, quote. and i know you ask this question because we're seeing a lot of chinese products sold and russian. yeah, i don't see anything wrong with that. i just wanted to know your opinion about that . i don't see anything wrong with that to take chinese cars because they are

competitive products and they will help us elevate our own car industry. little because you kind of grew without competition with in the soviet union. there was no competition, but people liked that. yes. i had a huge, equally car, for instance. oh good. but we could have had better quality. we've had there been market competition today when i look at ours, equally factory until the other car factories like guys, they try to stay competitive. take the most reach brand to some say, well, how can you call it a most of which is half of the parts are made in china. so what was the china is own car industry also had to start somewhere to do this, the mr. lab, ralph, going back to europe. and how would you explain the over the top hysteria that we're hearing from heads of european states saying that russia is about to attack them exposed to i could say that this is just paranoia and to be done with it. but i feel this is more of a cunning plan or what your opinion leaders badly needed is to squeeze money out of

their parliaments in order to keep the war going in the us, as you can see as lost, some of it z o in that respect we, we will see how the drama in the us is going to unfold with respect to the bills on the floor, some of which concern ukraine. but if we look into who is most active, most energetic when it comes to pumping ukraine with weapons. that is certainly the europeans, or look at all of shelves, believes he's leading the charge in terms of providing help to ukraine. we're a manual, and that crone the world longer were the smaller nations select the baltic states for the check republic. so the both the states, yes, the limit 12 states. now these are certainly things to consider. first of all, the you personified bubble rails sholtes were still of wonder line. they were so blatantly so transparent, so fixated on cutting off all ties. i mean, when they made their statements saying that russia is an enemy to be crushed, the crane was be saved. and now if they change anything about their rhetoric,

their political careers will end, their own political opposition will make quick work of them. and secondly, the reason they want the money is because they will have to explain to their people . so why there can no longer be any cheaper gas, cheaper oil. why the prices are on the rise. why as a result of the sanctions, their countries are undergoing the industrialization why german factories have to move their production to the us or china. a recent example of the latter, it was one of the shelves visited china, accompanied by germany's business leaders. the reason they came was not to agree on some mutually profitable projects, which negotiate the movements of their manufacturing to china. even if everyone comes down and we freeze the conflicts, you have to understand that these guys are having elections and a few months times. and in many you countries, there will be national elections, and their opposition is going to use this chance to demonstrate the economic and

social outcome of europe's policies. in any case, the opposition is not going to miss that opportunity. we will. but if you're a pain leaders suddenly stop telling tall tales about our so called plans to attack nato. then well, right now, they're hoping to scare the voters and continue with the same policies. but what amazes me is that at the start, when the special military operation 1st began, some people in the us and europe said that's how they accept a new crane into nato. cotton would not have been bold enough to attack it. and now they say ukraine must not be defeated because if it is put in, is going to immediately strike against nato, some of logic, right? all the want to do was scare people, terrify them into a medians. i don't know how to comment on all that really. there is this commander from norway who's saying europe must prepare for a military confrontation with russia in the arctic. they expect us to attack everywhere. vladimir putin said many times that there is no sense for us to attack them. if they would like to bring the needle boarders closer to ours,

we will not allow it to do this in ukraine. i don't know what will happen to western ukraine. many politicians express their own ideas about it, but russian, ukraine, that are originally was russians that wants to be part of russia that wants to speak. russians wants to educate children and russian wants to bring flowers to monuments commemorating people who shouldn't blood for this land. when it was russian or soviet, during the great patriotic war, this is not up to discussion. in my opinion, the of the only one main thing is important for not as an internationally speaking is that is that nations concepts are allowed to do anything. all the mazda races, and then you have the mind to nathan. so as a slave, americans rock obama and others have had

a concept of american exceptionalism. international law exist as long as it serves the american interest. if it doesn't, that doesn't exist by turning those russians. and so it is dangerous boy, a man that wants to take over the world. that was a culture strategy. since i'm the new one, i exist v i v. i not leashed it often zuba and tablet block. nato said it's ours. we move east. the reason us, hey jim, it is dangerous. is it the by the sovereignty of the countries, the exceptionalism that america uses and its international war planning is one of the greatest threats to the populations of different nations. of nature, what is founded shareholders in the united states and elsewhere in large arms companies would lose millions and millions or is business businesses good? and that is the reality of what, what we're facing,

which is fashion. the the change is why is why in this country if i give but plenty of the store in this shed and a short order for now, i'm not going to say lots of green scans when i am what i could catch at your desktop session. let's just shiny or just is funny. mine is when you sit on what's in the the near the,

the every spring and summer. the melting optics move reveals a band and machinery, millions of rusty barrels, and the detritus left by human expansion into this most inaccessible of territories . yes, i used to move so as a customer both of us for some reason, you know, at the post the beach and as an issue, calling to us from clean optic travels the highest island home to the biggest opponent station on the front of joseph land, occupied the go really asked me for i was my was are more you should. so it means if you have, when you feel when we see lots of money and i'm familiar with this, so i'm gonna stay on the old stuff last time. i feel like i'm a former student, let me see me and i'm not sure if i need to. i've got to read on serial. no boys to play middle at least join me instead of the optic pioneers main objective was to

explore and come kind of these harsh lands. they had no time to think about waste management now and, and then i guess they could remain for centuries. that's my of my choice of so it's pretty at the course you system is a smart upon you to go, but the team could have to deal with the issue the or the now can you use visa, typically from here, sir, to nancy kim's in the book, is that for algebra then actually should see where it gets to the young showcase use the so i'm just going to the ways that the boys, the,

the most name that will be for them imagery of assess florida doesn't want that extra them. but adults of under that the students, the beginning of it says to read the united states of america has officially declared the striving for freedom and people's rights to happiness. however, in reality, having one independent american colon is tested for the total extermination of the

indigenous population of the continent, american indians were deprived of their land. local residents were driven into reservation, given the worst agricultural territories, while the best land was appropriated by white colonizers, the strongest blow to american indian tribes was the extermination of vice of native americans lived by hunting these wild animal. the colonists slaughtered the bivens and in fact, made them nearly extinct. every buffalo, jed, he's in india and gone, said colonel richard dogs, a veteran of the bloody and vicious indian wars cynically the indigenous population was simply exterminated us army general phillips sheridan express the evidence of this policy in the infamous words. the only good india is a debt indian, the genocide of native americans of north america, lead to a demographic catastrophe. the exact number of deaths is still unknown,

but the number of victims is in millions. having been a majority on the continent before the indigenous people make up less than 3 percent of the us population today. the, the garage of business and the system with the screen on the bus can do either just keep them in the system with key at the washington state, the rules to complete the rest of the guys just the phone and send that to us to professionally that video to you for the list of over the age what they use for level

the of the month of fruitless negotiations. the us were supposedly agrees to withdraw his troops from nisha as a country seeking the pop is to find terrorism more effective date. the luscious farm industry condemns the ukrainians where we attack, which kills russian hill correspondence, samuel and aramon. calling to get evidence of k as a terrorist and nature, the at least 2 palestinians are killed doing it today is waiting re did. the ok pied westbank comes amid escalating settlement construction in the area of the speak to a palestinian who's received an eviction notice from the as rainy government in

front of my children's on.