3 great britain begin to conquer and colonize australia. from the very beginning of the british penetration to the continent. natives were subjected to severe violence and deliberate extra patient. according to modern historians, in the 1st 140 years, there were at least 270 massacres of local depot. any resistance to the british was answered with double cruelty. hundreds of natives were killed for the murder of one settler. indigenous australians were not considered complete people. no wild beast of the forest was ever hunted down with such unsparing perseverance as they are. men, women and children are shot whenever they can be met with squatter, henry, my rake wrote in a letter to his family in england, in $1846.00 plus scro you as bad as these rightly described as blood. so and racist eve at the beginning of colonization, there were one and a half 1000000 indigenous people living on the continent. then, by the beginning of the 20th century,

their number had degrees still 100000 people. despite the indisputable historical facts, the problem of full recognition of the crimes of white australians against aborigines has not been resolved so far. the sea really truly shows gonzales to mr. lab rob. you said that the opposition there is going to use this chance to undermine the people whose policy is based on destroying russia. are there any people maybe not clocks or maybe not dogs, but some reasonable people that we could deal with the same? we were already dealing with someone menu. meaningless. did they have a chance to, for instance, take the place of bull around schultz mac or on, or other people or when you to the that's, it's hard for me to guess because everything is happening in secrets. these people are not elected, they're appointed by a small group or as goals for the european commissions. and the european council is

much that's how the high representative for foreign affairs and security policies are pointed to. we are never against contacts with any political players to be able to, especially the ones that are part of the system taking for instance, marine the pens, party or alternative for germany and other movements that are not so prominent and can take national for raj, for example, this is a british politician who's participating very actively in the promotion of conservative groups. they have just held a legitimate conference in brussels, which is a regular events in the head of the local district in brussels. shut down the event after 2 hours, despite it being a legitimate for him, attended by victor or ben natural for raj and other conservatives. when he came there with the police and said that it had to be shut down and you're the one you 0 with the goal is a tired oh, spell the the little yes, the guards are tired and can be claimed. they are extreme is supporting extremist ideas. this is an example of western, haven't congress,

who they are sure of. they are impunity, dominance and superior order. one alternative for germany started getting additional points according to opinion polls. they were accused of being russian agents. 2 germans were cods, who apparently spied and prepared terrorist attacks against american military bases in germany. and some enterprises that ship weapons to ukraine to people were apprehended in parentheses. and let me also noticed our investor with someone they told him that there were 2 people arrested it to be so they could easily find this needle in a haystack. literally, we would compare this to the north stream, terrorist attack, which was an extremely lucrative initiative for germany. this took several months of preparation. involved naval and air forces of many nato countries. and the information about this is public now or something. nobody notices. as opposed to 2 citizens who allegedly were in the process of preparing an act of terrorism, which they were found immediately to the accusations that opposition parties are

gaining momentum because they are supported by rush around through various means, including a legal one. so those are very telling them we used to say that to the french, to the british, to the americans and other members of nato. and that you saying that's what we said to them. was that not only their embassies are involved in some activities about which there are some rumors, i know they were caught red handed to pull some of their staff. they used to hire locals for administrative and technical work. they were sent to russian regions and being part of our community. they used it to promote anti government movements and for an agents. and this causes indignation of goods so they can do whatever they want, as opposed to us. we were even advised against meeting with alternative for germany . i remember it very well. i think i have the headquarters has been searched by investigators freedom and democracy. the parliamentary party, mister monro floor, was suddenly invited to celebrate the

h as anniversary of the norman landings. are we going? it's just my 1st question and secondly, does smartphone have a split personality of what's going on? because we were not invited? actually. it is their mode of operation. when they're going to do something, they're unable to act as polite. people like people send a letter and then make the announcements. however, here they say, we're going to invite someone, not putin. we will invite someone and nobody invites anyone that we haven't gotten anything. if we do, we will let you know when you move. i can only say that 5 years ago when the march of the 75th anniversary of the normandy landings, our country was represented by the ambassador. 10 years ago in 2014. there was a meeting there that initiated the normandy formats on his crane. started the process that resulted in signing the agreements that neither friends nor germany, nor ukraine intended to comply with. so you can imagine what allusions we now have

a lot. so maybe it's a good thing. they never invited us history, but in terms of historical truth and historical justice, there would have been no 2nd front, but without the her rogue deeds and sacrifices of tens of millions of soviet people . to give another example, the germans have it come a ration day for concentration camp the victims. but the announced with pride that the we're not going to invite russians this year. it's not really something to be proud of. let's return to the middle east. there was a strike on iran, in your opinion, things that are going on there. can they result in iran being forced to consider the nuclear weapons idea even if they never considered this previously, i get it in the model of the key with those sort of being a i've heard this line of reasoning for so it has been disseminated by these really media and in the west. i think the goal is to switch the attention of the global community from what is happening and guys, i've noticed that it's facing a humanitarian contest. special rubber tours of the you want to come in writes

council, have even use the word genocide. they want to switch the attention of the international community to a run as a threats and to ascribes to iran were among other things. so an attack with the use of nuclear weapons that it does not have mass confirmed by the i a and also some iran is the world's most inspected and p team member states. iran has a lot and even a fat, why? which is a decree, an announcement, or a documents by the supreme leader banning any such developments in the country. iran has no intention whatsoever to pursue any such operations. after iran responded to an unacceptable attack on the uranian consider building, there were afraid tallies in that attack, and iran responded. the russian and rainy and leaders spoke on the phone a couple of days ago. our representatives also contacted these railings and there was a clear sign in our message that we conveyed to these railings that iran is not seeking

any escalation. it has to respond to this. can we blatant violation of international law such as the attack on their diplomatic mission? what they don't want further escalation is, this is how all the experts interpreted around the response. i think, and i hope i'm not wrong. the same kind of response was given to us really actions against the nuclear facilities in iran, just behind to be of the for the rest of law roof was there it got to the iraq is real conflicts on beyond the arab israeli conflict. and iris announced as being unfolding in the middle east, given that it's also complicated that only experts can truly draw sprints. and it's a complexity actually pathetically. is there any hope for a future diplomatic solution for this region involved? and so the countries rochelle, all the countries or has have guns sold for this point, so much blood spilled. and so many feelings had that it has now evolved and zip packed showed you how the fox was

a small trend. threats over nuclear will for centuries to come. the food via the bodies, new list of the i believe fall misfortunes of the middle east is as far as the growth of extremism and terrorism is concerned. we are fueled by the fact that the palestinian issue was remains unresolved for 75 years. see me these to be, to live in 1948. it was promised that before rather decided that 2 states would be created. so this one state has been established, but the other is still not there. the united states promised to veto the palace seen in a request for un membership. they already did in the territories that were determined for each state back in 1948. now look completely different of many of the territories that were initially allotted to the palestinians are now qualified in the u. n. s. occupied territories because they were not a portion to, to israel back then in the 2 states resolutions. but the situation has evolved,

of course, after the 1967 war and we're now talking about the 1967 borders instead of the 1948 to fortress. it was mandated by the one decision recognizing the 1967 borders with the capital of palestine in east jerusalem on the return of refugees to palestine and equitable use of water and other fundamental issues. if this had been done, in my opinion, there's in the middle east would have been a much more peaceful place now. it's not 100 percent of course, but that is hardly possible here. but the palestinian leadership made some mistakes under yes. are our offense. agreements were assigned. mistakes were made by both sides, but the need for a political will and determination to deliver on the agreements as always been if key importance. when the court 10th of mediators comprising russia, the u. s. u and the un was active in 2003, some 20 years ago. the security council adopted

a roadmap for establishing the policy and stage within a year following a proposal by the quartet to go. it was a very detailed road map of providing a monthly and even a weekly timeframe for the process. and everyone was okay with it. it also took into account the territories, all the developments on the ground today we have guys. yes, but benjamin netanyahu has recently said that the gaza strip needs to be turned into a buffer zone, what they really want. and i don't know how it's going to end. take the town of rafa and southern gaza, for example, where 1500000 refugees are living in a horrible condition. so they would prefer all these people to go to egypt and let them turn gaza into a buffer zones where no one will mess with them. as for the west bank of the jordan river, the 2nd part of the palestinian state, which is supposed to be united geographically and logistically, westbank is full of illegal is rarely supplements and condemned even by the not

states. there are many thousands of israeli settlers there and then when gauge and conflicts, time and time again, and physical fights and shootings with the arabs. so however, if we don't start building the posting in stage, nothing good will come out of it. at some point the americans under president trump tried to declare palestine in the boundary as it had at the time, which meant the palestinians would have had to move between these small portions and pieces of land, which is impossible. but as netanyahu said, when everyone talked about keeping in mind, the need for conducting talks on a posting in states. after the hug phase of the conflict was over. he said he was not going to focus on the issue of the palestinian state, but to restrict his efforts to ensure in israel, security, and of conversation. when the cease fire resolution was adopted, the lady representing the us in the un security council and firms that the us had refrained from the towing into this. but pointed out the resolution was non bindings and in this line of thoughts and the americans may consider all other

things related to the palestinian state issue as non binding as well. this is a very bad situation. we want to put an end to violence, to address who monetary and issues. and most of all, we would like the arrows to come up with an initiative supported by all the forces that still have commonsense to take the matter of establishing a palestinian state into their own hands. one of the one where do we currently stand with our media and mr laffer off. we've been getting conflicting reports for could you provide an example? and what else to in europe on for instance, they keep saying that we do not behave very well, say in the c s t o we, yes, that's what they say. they also say that they don't benefit from participating in the raising economic union. among other things, you know, facts are stubborn things. armenia is our ally still and now like most so use making them we, we to believe we're allies from the legal perspective and not only from the legal

perspective. so i think there are still people in armenia who understands the importance of rush for the security and economic growth of their country, including their prime minister, who recently addressed the european parliament by saying if i'm not mistaken, that's relations between armine and russians are not going through the best of times, but they're important for our statehood sovereignty, security and economy cannot be overestimated. and of course, he also said that his country cherished the many positive things that used to be and still are in the relations between armenia and russia. i think these are very important words to some extent. they are a response to the insolent and shameless efforts of the united states and the european union for them to speed up the severance of armenia from rush almost past for the e. u. armenia is the country that receives the biggest benefits from this evening that is confirmed by the numbers. 35 percent of the armenian economy depends on the

countries the membership last year, 37 percent of our medias. trade. that's a little over $20000000000.00. was accounted for by the 13 percent by the european union and 3 percent is the share of the us. even in terms of pure numbers. we cannot say that the u is disadvantageous to armenia. armenia being a small country contributes much less compared to other states, including financial actually is financial contributions are much smaller. but nonetheless, it enjoys the same rights as every other member states. including rush out whenever discussions are taken whenever the voting takes place in the you. so use gas problem, armenian pays 177. you was dollars per 1000 cubic liter. so russian gas, which is half or even one 3rd of the price the west is paying and if they plan on supplying their own gas to armenia,

i am not sure how that could play out in the us is now demanding that they shut down their nuclear power plant and replace it with american small modular reactors, s m r's. and i hope they armenians understands the importance of their met some more m p p. so right now the south caucasus railway, they have been enjoying preferential tariffs for passenger transportation infrastructure investments. and many other things, all these years, these angles, or copper molybdenum combine, is the main tax bear into the armenians budget. i'm saying there's to those who seek to make it look like the smaller mania is being exploited and abused by russia and the you know, they should bear this in mind. the same goes for the see us to jo. unfortunately, when 3 try part type agreements were concluded after november 2020 and this is providing for a normal well balanced process of normalizing relations and resuming all context between the member states. the you and the us started interfering with the process

right away. trying to privatize the results and stop pressure from implementing the agreements that were reached just like they did in 2003 when the cossacks memorandum on the territorial integrity of mold overall was signed with the special privileges granted to trans nestor. it was initially and the leaders were almost headed to choose and now to sign it, the president turned back on his way to the airport. right. and smearing off received a phone call from the use of cell on that. who said that they only had 15 years to remove all the russian depots and the troops. he said they wanted this process to be set up and banned them from signing the documents. that is what happens with with you, but it is a fact that the 2022 segments in europe on the seat is t o. fully agreed with the documents stipulating for additional arguments for border security, running special military drills and, and deploying

a c t o security emission in armenia and they were all ministers signed it, including the armenian wonderful. but the very next morning when the remaining prime minister opens the summits and he said that consensus was not reached. however, reaching a consensus didn't seem a problem for armenia on the subject of the e. u mission on that mission's original mandate was for 2 months. but now it isn't permanent, a subscription. there are now canadians on that mission and other needle members want to joins to move. so it is no longer going to be an even mission, which is going to be a native mission. we should ask for the arguments and that the c s t o could not define the scope of its mandate in armenia, testing is that our mania cannot define the scope itself. they said they were ready to respect the borders established by the 1991 elma t declaration together with as there by john here. that recognize as car box has part of his urban shots. but at the same time, they set up

a de limitation commission fluid and prime minister pushing and just recently started talking about 4 villages in the tab, which region that he's ready to seats for, which he is now trying to convince the local population that this would be the right thing to do what i need to ask for the 1991 borderline. that's passion. unwanted. the c s t o to support and protect t is disregarding it to himself. these d limitation talks and his other initiatives are changing that very borderline or that is why 1st before claiming that the c s t o needs to define the scope of his mandate. armenia needs to define his borders as complete the de limitation process . and that's what the armenian authorities are currently busy with. however, when the document was signed and endorsed by the e. u. so he's saying that car box belongs to us or by john. and they want to declare ration his enforce. it said nothing about any special rights for the armenian ethnic minority in our survey on nothing at all. but that is why claiming

that armenians had to leave car box because our peacekeepers didn't help them is wrong. the only person i'm supposed to say, no one else sounds bad a little. yeah. which in, well to wrap it up, i'd like to get back to what i said in the beginning of the lecture nichol pushing on said, we value the relationships we have had with russia. it is hard to over estimate what russian did for our sovereignty for our economy. every aspect of our relations must be valued. and i hope that we will have contacts with the presidents. and we'll be able to discuss this openly without any arguments provided by our wishes from the west. but as will it passes for me, but i'm not sure which way since we're talking about our access, we'll want to live in peace like in the popular comp to but it doesn't work with abner one kind. it seems like view when you were wanting our neighbor, moldova announced the referendum on this subject. i'm joining the you in awesome on

as you can perfectly understand the people living in terms of history and drug guys . yeah. you know, i'm not really thrilled by the idea. what do you think about this is a need for speaking on a broad, the terms of what should be do to prevent it from happening again. and again, that's just same way it's happening. i mean, yeah, like you just mentioned when they said, well, be your mission works for us while yours just thousands to play these nations office distancing themselves from us and to. and it's very disappointing to see what the sadness of that sure thing i'm leaving the be the. yes it is. it really is disappointing. is disappointing that back in 2003. the then president of molto, but didn't have enough of it wasn't even the courage he needed to sign the document . it was already initial. all it needed was his signature. and the issue of these immunization warehouses would have probably been already solved by now. well, we can say what if all we want,

but history deals and facts. the west operates aggressively, and they are pushing, acting without any decorum. and now they are converting from acendo and to a person who is dragging. literally dragging was moved over into nato to into the landscape of the weather, directly, or by joining romania. yes, because the landscape played the same role, but should 1st portion co started dragging ukraine in tomato and we amended the ukranian constitution. then zalinski continued. and what miss sanders is doing now in moldova is very much in the spirit of a dictatorship from this world and the west, not only dozens minds, that when the west understands that there is a need to act firmly on or suppress any kind of opposition. it allows its puppets to do just that, and stephen encourages them to do so it's the same happens in georgia and she went all those protests made solomon's the rubbish. surely, a fighter for freedom of speech,

even though the law that triggered the protests is not harsh at all in poland, in the us and france and many other states in the u. similar laws treat the same as a crime and punish it with a fine if the guilty party, for instance, receives international funding from fails to declare it and misuse us. but in georgia, all you have to do was simply declare receiving more than 20 percent of funding for your organization coming from abroad. nothing more. ask for multi bill them. if they go through with their referendum on joining the you, you know, the gals young has already said it will not recognize the outcome of this referendum machine, especially since they are already experiencing a crack down on their rights for simply saying that they do not want to join the you and for suggesting that maybe the country should look for other alliances and develop relations with russia and all other neighbors. in response,

the government cuts their subsidies from the state budget that they are entitled to . the same is happening in trans nestor. they want to turn to try semester into a conflict zone. so i'm sure you've heard proposals to use military force to suppress this region and doesn't deal yet another strategic blow to rush on. they will never succeed to ask for all those for nationals or now leading the countries of their so called origin. i don't think that they will enjoy the support for a long time. and i am not even speaking about wielding any authority. even those forces that are trying to benefit from this a temporary situation, that is parts of the us overall strategy will not back them for long. no one likes to people like that. i know because i'm god bless you this year. russia is hosting a brick summit. what are the challenges, objectives, and prospects that you see in relation to it and says most of the solution reduced to be something that we have plans, a lot of activities,

$250.00 events. that's where the challenges we need to ensure a smooth introduction of new member states. and so all process the number of member states has doubled. now, while the organization already has its traditions, procedures, and agreements, including the culture of consensus and mutual supports that we have been working out during the many years of the existence of rigs with 5 member states. there are many mechanisms that are already working, which is why the new members will have to participate with not only in the ministerial meetings and the summit advance, but also in central meetings for i team, security, agriculture and banking. that's what i can say. insurance offers. speaking of the objectives, the last summit requested the finance ministers and central banks to present their proposals on alternative payment platforms. this is very important to help us

secure economic ties and ensure our economic prospect, which i believe are very solid in which we have many plans. and we need to protect them from the self serving interests of the west. so that now undermines of the trust things that open the global financial systems man, the global economy, it had created one solution, allegedly for the benefit of all countries, the go button, what is your solution this? thank you for answering all the questions. it seems we have covered, i want to send over an importance and we have one more minutes. and if you'd like to say anything else in case we didn't ask you something, no, i'm good. i would only like to wish you to keep working on developing rush and mass media the same way you're doing it with a deal with with thank you very much. and what wish you to just stay the way you all can with our country and all of you was not here unless you're always very clear in what you said. you know what to say about all those who are in the room. and i wish you a lots of coverage on this very difficult try. yes. one more thing i'd like to say

. i'd like to remind all the likes of ms. sam, do ones. all those want to drag are maney away of the very thing you'll said for real said, and we talked about it today. he said, we are not fighting for ukraine. we're fighting against russia, that is a threat to us. or when he was convincing the population of europe to continue this war. and then after that, so lensky said they are not fighting for ukraine. they are fighting for their own interests. i finally saw it. i knew. so i'd like to see all those words being groomed by the west. now to finally understand that as soon as possible, i think they know it, but it's not stopping now dealing with what can you say about the quote, if you don't want to talk to lab wrong, then you'll talk to shy goose. i saw it printed on t shirts already. thank you very much. missed a lot problem and thanks to all of you were helping me next yet. and the same formats. and i hope for margaret when used to discuss the,

the, the when the world's largest democracy votes, the rest of the planet watches in emerging multi polar world. india's voice matters . but who will be the power behind watches, almost $1000000000.00 people decide and billions more, react,

the what is part of is it that the employee would post good, isn't the defense you of us and that in the word part, is it something deeper or complex? might be present, let's stop without please. is that scope out of the as the dns of the new jews goes as then choose for many essentially it's one of them made best the cube ones, bullshit, games, breast. and nobody can know, it seems that the bodies in the, on smoking,

by the same with the the us congress, 3 lights, another $16000000000.00 plus for ukraine, despite the majority of, for a public and the highest members of this saturday, opposing the bill also coming up on the for the on over night is really strong on the residential building in the southern galvan city of hold off 5 kills at least 9 people are treating 6 children according to local authorities. also the .